Week 8: Key terms
Collaborative learning encompasses and synthesises a number of trajectories and principles (already touched on in other modules) which have contributed to an ongoing paradigm shift in approaches to teaching in the last half-century.
Table 1. Comparison of old and new paradigms of teaching
Factor |
Old paradigm of teaching |
New paradigm of teaching |
Knowledge |
Transferred from teacher to students |
Jointly constructed by students and teachers |
Students |
Passive vessel to be filled by teacher’s knowledge |
Active constructor, discoverer, transformer of own knowledge |
Teacher purpose |
Classify and sort students |
Develop students’ knowledge, skills and attributes |
Relationships |
Impersonal relationships among students and between teachers and students |
Personal transaction among students, and between teachers and students |
Way of working |
Competitive/individualistic |
Collaborative learning in the classroom, and collaborative teams among teachers |
Assumption |
Any expert can teach |
Teaching is complex and requires considerable training |
Source: Adapted from Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co.
As you engage with the literature around collaborative learning, you’re likely to find references to other terms, such as cooperative learning, peer learning, group learning activities, peer-to-peer learning, team-based learning, and perhaps even others. There’s quite a lot of arcane academic debate about subtle differences between the meanings of these terms, but much of the time they also seem to be used interchangeably. Which is what we’ve done for this introductory module; you can pursue the terminological nuances as required as your teaching vocation develops in the future.
For present purposes, we’ll take our cue from the video below from Doug Shaw, Director and Founder of What Goes Around Limited, together with this definition from David Boud:
“students learning with and from each other as fellow learners without any implied authority to any individual, based on the tenet that students learn a great deal by explaining their ideas to others and by participating in activities in which they can learn from their peers” (Boud, 2001, p. 3).