During the 2016 election, did you feel like a certain businessman-turned-politician was always in the news? Well, you’re right to feel that way. Coverage of the 2016 primaries was noticeably skewed in favor of particular candidates and more often than not, totally ignored the issues in favor of competition between candidates.

Negative media attention and public perceptions

The media has a power influence on how we view certain news stories. Many of us are familiar with the famous McDonald’s coffee lawsuit, in which the 2.8 million dollar settlement garnered headlines and the plaintiff, Ms. Stella Liebeck became the butt of jokes and insults across the country. The true facts of the case and the severity of Ms. Liebeck’s burns were left out of news reports, entirely changing the narrative of the story for decades to come.

Warning: the following video contains some graphic images.

(Alternatively: Please read the write-up by the NYT.)

In 2014, cable news outlets came under fire for their non-stop, panic-inducing coverage of the Ebola crisis in western Africa. From Harvard Politics:

Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus made a similar argument in an October column, writing, “There are no viewers for the plane that doesn’t fall from the sky. The adage, ‘If it bleeds, it leads,’ is terrifyingly apt when it comes to hemorrhagic fever. So we swarm to Dallas, interview neighbors, tweet breaking-news bulletins.” In an interview with the HPR, Karen Dill-Shackleford, director of the media psychology program at Fielding Graduate University, argued that cable news outlets have been particularly bad about spreading misinformation about Ebola. “They know that these things are not true in the way that they present them, but they’re just trying to drum up interest, and unfortunately they just usually push the simple button which is fear.”

Some compared media coverage of the 2014 outbreak to AIDs coverage in the early 1980s – panicked, hysterical, and often wrong. How did media coverage of the outbreak affect your views on it? Others found good in the heavy media coverage, estimating that increased media exposure in the west would hasten a search for a cure or vaccine, while news coverage of American and European victims of the virus would help dispel skepticism about the disease in Africa.